GUIDELINES FOR ACCREDITATION OF COLLEGES OFFERING KASNEB COURSES
PART I BACKGROUND ON kasneb 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 Legal framework kasneb was inaugurated on 24 July 1969 as a state corporation under the National Treasury. kasneb operates under the following main Acts: The Accountants Act, Cap. 531 of the laws of Kenya which was enacted in July 1977, gave kasneb retroactive recognition since its inception in 1969. The Accountants Act, Cap. 531 was repealed and replaced with the Accountants Act, No. 15 of 2008 which received Presidential assent on 24 December 2008 and took effect from 30 December 2008. The Certified Public Secretaries of Kenya Act (Cap. 534) mandates kasneb as the examining body for the Certified Secretaries (CS) examination. The Investment and Financial Analysts Act, No. 13 of 2015 mandates kasneb as the examining body for the Certified Investment and Financial Analysts (CIFA) examination. 1.1.2 Mandate The mandate of kasneb is the development of syllabuses, conduct of professional, diploma and technician examinations and certification of candidates in accountancy, finance, credit, governance and management, information technology and related disciplines, the promotion of its qualifications nationally and internationally and the accreditation of institutions training in courses examinable by kasneb in liaison with the Ministry in charge of education. 1.1.3 Vision Global leader in examination and certification of business professionals. 1.1.4 Mission Empowering professionals globally by offering quality examinations and undertaking research and innovation. 1.1.5 Core values Integrity. Professionalism. Customer focus. Teamwork. Innovativeness. 1.2 EXAMINATIONS OF kasneb Currently, kasneb offers the following examinations: 1.2.1 Professional examinations Certified Public Accountants (CPA) examination. Certified Secretaries (CS) examination. Certified Information Communication Technologists (CICT) examination. Certified Credit Professionals (CCP) examination. Certified Investment and Financial Analysts (CIFA) examination. 1.2.2 Diploma examinations Accounting Technicians Diploma (ATD) examination. Diploma in Information Communication Technology (DICT) examination. Diploma in Credit Management (DCM) examination. 1.2.3 Certificate examinations Certificate in accounting and management skills (CAMS) examinations 1.3 ACCREDITATION OF TRAINING INSTITUTIONS 1.3.1 Legal mandate to accredit training institutions The mandate to accredit training institutions is derived from Section 17(1) (h) of the Accountants Act, No. 15 of 2008 which empowers kasneb to accredit institutions offering training in courses examinable by kasneb in liaison with the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. 1.3.2 Purpose of accreditation Accreditation is a process broadly aimed at recognising training institutions for the quality and integrity of their training programmes, which entitles them to the confidence of stakeholders including students, parents and guardians, kasneb and the public at large. The process provides an assessment of a training institution’s effectiveness in complying with the accreditation requirements set by kasneb and its continuing efforts to enhance the quality of student learning programmes and services. In particular, accreditation of training institutions by kasneb is intended to: Ensure that the overall quality of education and training for kasneb courses is maintained at a consistently high level. Assure the students and other stakeholders that the training institutions possessed adequate and appropriate human, financial, technological and physical resources and such other facilities necessary to mount the courses efficiently and effectively. Encourage institutional improvement in the quality of training through continuous self-study and evaluation. Promote good governance in the management and administration of training institutions. Provide advice and continuously encourage and support the training institutions to maintain and enhance quality standards in training. The accreditation process will be guided by the tenets of fairness, integrity, confidentiality and professional judgement with a focus on rigorous application of standards and rules. The successful implementation of the accreditation exercise is also premised on a culture of trust between kasneb and the training institution being accredited. The product of accreditation will be a formal and public acknowledgement by kasneb through certification, of a training institution’s continuing capacity to provide effective learning programmes and services based on set standards. 1.3.3 Institutional commitment and responsibilities The effectiveness of the accreditation process will depend on the acceptance by training institutions of certain responsibilities, including involvement in and commitment to the accreditation process. Training institutions are expected to uphold the principle of integrity when providing information to kasneb, disclosing their accreditation status to the public and other parties and generally in all matters relating to their operations and decisions. In this respect, evidence of withholding information, providing inaccurate information to the public, failing to provide timely and accurate information to kasneb, or failing to conduct an accurate and complete self-assessment and other similar practices may be interpreted as lack of full commitment to integrity. Failure of a training institution to fully adhere to the principle of integrity may result into nonconsideration of the institution for accreditation or loss of accreditation. Accredited training institutions or those in the process of being evaluated for accreditation, are expected to notify kasneb of any changes that may affect their accreditation status. Where a training institution modifies or expands its scope in relation to kasneb courses and other programmes offered, changes the nature of its affiliation or its ownership, or merges with another institution, a substantive reassessment may be required. If an institution is unsure as to whether a change is substantive in nature, it should contact kasneb for advice. Training institutions are expected to dedicate themselves to continuously enhance the quality of their teaching, physical facilities and other services available to their students. This calls for institutional commitment to the concept of quality enhancement through continuous assessment and improvement. Training institutions shall ensure that their training programmes are complemented by support structures and resources that allow for the holistic growth and development of their students. Training institutions accredited by kasneb are expected to maintain good working relationships and co-operate with other recognised accrediting bodies and regulatory agencies. Where another recognised accrediting body or regulatory agency revokes its accreditation or recognition respectively, or places the training institution under investigation or probation, then the training institution concerned shall immediately report that action to kasneb. A training institution shall also disclose to kasneb instances where the institution has been denied accreditation status by another accreditation body. Training institutions are expected to extend full co-operation to officers of kasneb or their
GUIDELINES FOR ACCREDITATION OF COLLEGES OFFERING KASNEB COURSES Read Post »