Exam focus The field of forensic accounting is a specialist branch of the profession carried out by forensic accountants encompassing forensic auditing and investigation. Forensic engagements require a much broader range of skills than other typical non-audit engagements. However, they still require the application of traditional auditing skills and techniques. Two articles have been published on this syllabus area by the examining team: ‘Forensic Auditing’ (September 2008) and ‘Massaging the Figures’ (April 2009). These can be downloaded from the ACCA website. 1 What is a forensic audit? Definitions Forensic audit This refers to the specific procedures within a forensic investigation in order to obtain . This could include the use of traditional financial auditing techniques such as analytical procedures and substantive procedures, for example to quantify a fraud or to determine the amount of an insurance claim. Some of the major applications of forensic auditing are shown below: Application Examples Type of work performed Fraud Theft of company funds, Funds tracing, asset investigations tax evasion, insider identification and recovery, dealing. forensic intelligence gathering, due diligence reviews, interviews, detailed review of documentary . Insurance claims Business interruptions, Detailed review of the policy property losses, motor from either an insured or vehicle incidents, insurer’s perspective to personal liability claims, investigate coverage issues, cases of medical identification of appropriate malpractice, wrongful method of calculating the dismissal. loss, quantification of losses. Professional Loss suffered as a result Advising on merits of a case negligence of placing reliance on in regards to liability, professional adviser. quantifying losses. As part of the assignment a forensic accountant will: Communicate their findings in the form of reports, exhibits and collections of documents. Assist in legal proceedings, including testifying in court as an expert witness and preparing visual aids to support trial . The forensic accountant may be used as an expert witness where: They have experience, expertise, and training appropriate to the value, complexity, and importance of the case. They have the expertise relevant to the issue on which an opinion is sought. It is a reasonable requirement to resolve proceedings. Examples Tesco In 2014, Tesco, Britain’s biggest retailer revealed that it had overstated estimated profits by £263 million by overestimating revenues paid to it by suppliers. Tesco was struggling to maintain market share due to pressure from competitors Aldi and Lidl. Toshiba In 2015, the electronics company Toshiba admitted that it had overstated its earnings by nearly $2 billion over seven years. An independent investigation found that “Toshiba had a corporate culture in which management decisions could not be challenged” and “Employees were pressured into inappropriate accounting by postponing loss reports or moving certain costs into later years. Sainsbury’s In June 2012, three men were jailed after defrauding the supermarket Sainsbury’s. 2 directors at potato supplier, Greenvale, were found to have overcharged Sainsbury’s £8.7 million in agreement with Sainsbury’s potato buyer, John Maylam. £4.9 million was paid to Maylam as his share and he also received excessive gifts and hospitality. The Sainsbury’s contract was worth £40 million to Greenvale and the directors did not want to risk losing that amount of business and hence bribed Maylam to ensure the contract remained in place. 2 Acceptance considerations As with any assignment, the practitioner must only take on work of acceptable level of risk. The acceptance matters given in 6 must be considered. Most importantly for forensic audits, the practitioner must ensure they can comply with the fundamental ethical principles. Professional competence and due care Forensic investigations involve very specialist skills, including: Detailed knowledge of the relevant legal framework. An understanding of how to gather specialist . Skills in the safe custody of , including maintaining a clear chain of . Strong personal skills: interview techniques, presentation of material in court. Confidentiality During legal proceedings the court will require the practitioner to reveal information discovered during the investigation. There is an overriding requirement to disclose all of the information deemed necessary by the court. Outside of the court, the practitioner must maintain confidentiality, especially because much of the information they have access to will be highly sensitive. Objectivity The practitioner must always be, and be perceived to be, independent. This is particularly important if the forensic report is going to be submitted to a court of law. Any threat to objectivity could undermine the credibility of the provided. To assess independence, the expert should consider whether the opinion would be the same if they were engaged by the opposing party. In particular the accountant must safeguard against self-review and advocacy threats. An advocacy threat arises because the firm may feel pressured into promoting the interests and point of view of their fee paying client, which breaches the concept of objectivity in court proceedings. In particular, the forensic expert has a duty to provide to the court which overrides any obligation to the client paying them. The practitioner must communicate this duty to the client to prevent any misunderstanding. A self-review threat arises when an auditor also becomes involved in some form of forensic work because the investigation is likely to involve fraud or potential misstatement within the financial statements. Separate teams must be used for the different engagements. Integrity Given the nature of their work, forensic professionals are likely to deal frequently with individuals who lack integrity or may be involved